The principles and regulations established in a community by some authority and applicable to its folks, whether or not in the kind of legislation or of custom and policies recognized and enforced by judicial choice. These are the only two problems exactly where, contrary to the common spirit of the republic of the United States, law has assumed the character of a plunderer. Consumer law could contain something from regulations on unfair contractual terms and clauses to directives on airline baggage insurance. Furthermore, it need to not be said that the law may be philanthropic if, in the process, it refrains from oppressing persons and plundering them of their home this would be a contradiction. And let it not be stated — as it continually is said — that below this notion, the law would be atheistic, individualistic, and heartless that it would make mankind in its personal image.
Those who desire to establish equivalent institutions must do as follows: Establish common ownership of house as in the republic of Plato revere the gods as Plato commanded prevent foreigners from mingling with the individuals, in order to preserve the customs let the state, instead of the citizens, establish commerce.
See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of yet another by performing what the citizen himself can not do without having committing a crime. The particular person who profits from this law will complain bitterly, defending his acquired rights. If a nation had been founded on this basis, it seems to me that order would prevail among the folks, in thought as effectively as in deed. An additional impact of this tragic perversion of the law is that it provides an exaggerated value to political passions and conflicts, and to politics in basic.
It should be admitted that the accurate solution — so lengthy searched for in the location of social relationships — is contained in these simple words: Law is organized justice. If you can’t reconcile these contradictions, then you should conclude that the law cannot organize labor and market without having organizing injustice. He had carried out nothing at all but his duty and the law of nations would have justified him. I say that this act is exactly what the law is supposed to suppress, always and everywhere. Therefore, if there exists a law which sanctions slavery or monopoly, oppression or robbery, in any form whatever, it should not even be mentioned. We need to remember that law is force, and that, consequently, the correct functions of the law can not lawfully extend beyond the proper functions of force.
Mr. Louis Blanc would say — and with reason — that these minimum guarantees are merely the beginning of total fraternity he would say that the law ought to give tools of production and free of charge education to all functioning folks. Until that occurs, the couple of practice lawful plunder upon the many, a typical practice where the proper to participate in the making of law is limited to a few persons. It is not true that the function of law is to regulate our consciences, our ideas, our wills, our education, our opinions, our perform, our trade, our talents, or our pleasures. Yet another individual would observe that this arrangement would nevertheless leave room for inequality he would claim that the law should give to everybody even in the most inaccessible hamlet — luxury, literature, and art. It is not considered sufficient that the law must be just it must be philanthropic.